Thursday, October 12, 2017

Consciousness

I've been following philosophical discussions about AI recently. One idea which seems to penetrate the discussion a whole lot is about whether we should treat AI machines with compassion if they ever reach "consciousness".

I think this is a flawed question because I don't think consciousness is a binary switch, I think it's a spectrum. Consciousness is a fundamental property all living things have evolved with to different degrees. Mold, for example, can grow and form itself by reacting to the environment, and trees "know" when to grow and shed leaves. I think when you look at it this way, consciousness is nothing more than a very complicated accumulation of indifferent particles reacting to the environment by the laws of nature. I think its tempting to see ourselves with such an advanced level of thinking that it's tempting to draw an artificial line in the spectrum and declare one side conscious.

This becomes relevant when talking about morality, but i'll save that for a different rant :)



Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Liberals and cognitive bias

I've recently become aware of the strong liberal backlash to offensive ideas being shared on US campuses. Two of which that annoy me most are the Berkeley University protest and the Yale student mob harassing the professor Nicholas Christakis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELzUfKWTvI0).

It's tough to say when you view these things on YouTube whether these events are an accurate representation of liberal ideas. None the less, I've noticed my own liberal friends become increasingly more staunch about their ideas, so I think this rise in dogmatic and violent liberalism is somewhat accurate. Here's a cartoon mocking what I think is a mainstream liberal and conservative approach to truth.



I suspect the leading cause of this is that most young people trap themselves in virtual echo chambers, which leaves them emotionally hypersensitive to opposing ideas. This makes it harder to view social issues objectively. How can you have a rational conversation about gay rights when the atmosphere is so emotionally unstable? It's just not a good way to pursue truth! 

I fear that the internet has also become the modern day equivalent of gathering your pitch fork and torch. It's easy for a group of people to damage businesses via reviews, and it's even easier to write hate speech anonymously via message boards. Having the power to cause an instantaneous effect due to a spike in emotion is a cause for instability. And das bad.

You're gonna be surprised to hear me say this, but I think the main culprit of these problems is NOT religion, it's the internet. We're biologically predisposed to seek confirmation bias, and to feel anger, and I think these primal parts of ourselves are being facilitated with 21st century technology.




Sunday, October 8, 2017

objective truth

I've met people who study philosophy who claim that 'everything is subjective'. This mocks that viewpoint.